Difference between revisions of "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge"
(→Congressional Letters) |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
*'''Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is widely opposed by the American people.''' According to public opinion research commissioned by [https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2017/01/18040010/E-12075-CAP-Energy-Enviro-Climate-Voters-FINAL.pdf the Center for American Progress,] two thirds of Americans oppose drilling in the Arctic Refuge, with a majority (52%) “strongly opposed.” And according to recent public polling done by [http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/americans-oppose-drilling-arctic-national-wildlife-refuge/ Yale Climate Connections,] a large majority of American voters (70%) oppose drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Those strongly opposed outnumber those who strongly support the policy by more than 4 to 1. | *'''Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is widely opposed by the American people.''' According to public opinion research commissioned by [https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2017/01/18040010/E-12075-CAP-Energy-Enviro-Climate-Voters-FINAL.pdf the Center for American Progress,] two thirds of Americans oppose drilling in the Arctic Refuge, with a majority (52%) “strongly opposed.” And according to recent public polling done by [http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/americans-oppose-drilling-arctic-national-wildlife-refuge/ Yale Climate Connections,] a large majority of American voters (70%) oppose drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Those strongly opposed outnumber those who strongly support the policy by more than 4 to 1. | ||
*For more than five decades, '''the Arctic Refuge has been a symbol''' of what we want for our future – the preservation of a way of life, climate justice, and the protection wild places. Not only does the mad dash to develop the Arctic Refuge threaten the place today, but it also will greatly shape the legacy we leave for future generations. | *For more than five decades, '''the Arctic Refuge has been a symbol''' of what we want for our future – the preservation of a way of life, climate justice, and the protection wild places. Not only does the mad dash to develop the Arctic Refuge threaten the place today, but it also will greatly shape the legacy we leave for future generations. | ||
− | *'''Banks are adopting policies that would preclude them from financing drilling in the Arctic Refuge'''. Financial institutions understand drilling in the Arctic Refuge would be a toxic investment and too big of a financial risk to take. | + | *'''Banks are adopting policies that would preclude them from financing drilling in the Arctic Refuge'''. Financial institutions understand drilling in the Arctic Refuge would be a toxic investment and too big of a financial risk to take. All six major U.S. banks [https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/wells-fargo-major-bank-end-arctic-oil-investment-69348355 (Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo)] along with over a dozen international banks have rejected financing for drilling in the Arctic Refuge. [https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/481272-democratic-senators-ask-banks-to-prohibit-funding-arctic-drilling Congressional leaders] have [https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/483871-33-democratic-lawmakers-urge-banks-to-halt-funding-anwr-drilling written letters] to the remaining major U.S. banks urging them to take this stance as well. |
==<span id="Fact Sheets"></span>Fact Sheets== | ==<span id="Fact Sheets"></span>Fact Sheets== |
Revision as of 08:05, 1 December 2020
KEY FACTS |
|
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is America’s largest wildlife refuge, comprising 19.6 million acres of one of the wildest corners left in North America. Its biological heart – the 1.6 million acre coastal plain – is home to countless species of birds and numerous land mammals, like caribou, musk oxen and polar bears. The place holds special meaning to the Gwich’in people, who today rely on caribou for their sustenance, as they have for thousands of years. For many adventurers, a visit to the Arctic Refuge is the wilderness experience of a lifetime. It is no wonder that the Arctic Refuge earned protections in 1960 shortly after Alaska became a state, which remained in place until December of 2017.
Today, for the first time in decades, the coastal plain faces potential oil and gas leasing, which would forever change this landscape. As the tax reform debate came to a close in 2017, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski slipped two pages of drilling text into the final bill, undermining decades of thoughtful management and protections. In an unprecedented mad dash, the Trump administration has moved to hold an oil and gas lease sale before the true impacts of Arctic Refuge development can be understood. The DOI most recently released the "record of decision" (ROD) for a lease sale in the Arctic Refuge. Please see below for relevant legislation, talking points, fact sheets and more on what we're doing to defend the Arctic Refuge.
Fact Sheets | Congressional Letters | Public Letters | Maps | Research & Reports
Recent Legislative Activity
- H.R. 7876 Polar Bear Cub Survival Act
- This bill would prohibit any oil and gas activities from occurring within 1 mile of polar bear maternal denning habitat in the coastal plain.
- To cosponsor, email Logan Ferree (mailto:logan.ferree@mail.house.gov) in Representative Huffman's office (D-CA).
- S. 2461 Arctic Refuge Protection Act
- This bill would designate the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge as protected wilderness.
- To cosponsor, email Hannah Vogel (mailto:hannah_vogel@markey.senate.gov) in Senator Markey's office (D-MA).
- Support letter from over 50 organizations
- H.R. 1146 Arctic Refuge Cultural & Coastal Plain Protection Act
- This bill would repeal the provision of the tax bill (H.R. 1) that mandates leasing in the Arctic Refuge.
- H.R. 1146 passed the House of Representatives on September 12th, 2019 and became the first stand alone bill to protect the Arctic Refuge to pass in Congress.
- Support letter from over 50 organizations
- H.R. 1 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act
- The overhaul of the American tax code came with a provision that mandated two oil and gas lease sales in the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge.
- This provision claimed that these lease sales would raise a total of $1 billion in revenue for the Federal Treasury
Talking Points
- The Trump administration is cutting corners to expedite oil and gas development. Interior’s rushed process to lease the coastal plain in place of a measured, science-driven effort that provides for robust public input is a disservice to the American people. Leaked memos from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other Department of the Interior agencies suggest that the BLM’s data is lacking and outdated and identify at least 20 major studies that should be conducted before giving oil and gas the green light.
- Indigenous voices in particular are being ignored. This is yet another example of the Trump administration disregarding Indigenous rights and public wishes in the rush to sell out our public lands to oil interests. Using a hurried, predetermined plan to complete an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) within one year and limit it to 150 pages is incompatible with protecting the wilderness and wildlife values of the Arctic Refuge or the subsistence needs of the Gwich’in people.
- The Arctic is ground zero for climate change; temperatures in the Arctic are rising at twice the rate of the rest of the planet. Villages are eroding into the sea, permafrost melt is making infrastructure insecure and food sources are disappearing. Based on the total annual indirect GHG emissions from the oil produced in the Arctic Refuge (averaged over the 70 year life of the field), under DOI’s ‘high-end case’ scenario in the FEIS, would be approximately 61.8 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent, which is equivalent to the annual emissions of more than 13 million passenger vehicles.
- Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is widely opposed by the American people. According to public opinion research commissioned by the Center for American Progress, two thirds of Americans oppose drilling in the Arctic Refuge, with a majority (52%) “strongly opposed.” And according to recent public polling done by Yale Climate Connections, a large majority of American voters (70%) oppose drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Those strongly opposed outnumber those who strongly support the policy by more than 4 to 1.
- For more than five decades, the Arctic Refuge has been a symbol of what we want for our future – the preservation of a way of life, climate justice, and the protection wild places. Not only does the mad dash to develop the Arctic Refuge threaten the place today, but it also will greatly shape the legacy we leave for future generations.
- Banks are adopting policies that would preclude them from financing drilling in the Arctic Refuge. Financial institutions understand drilling in the Arctic Refuge would be a toxic investment and too big of a financial risk to take. All six major U.S. banks (Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo) along with over a dozen international banks have rejected financing for drilling in the Arctic Refuge. Congressional leaders have written letters to the remaining major U.S. banks urging them to take this stance as well.
Fact Sheets
- Banks Reject Financing For Arctic Refuge Drilling
- Oil and Gas Activities Threaten Arctic Refuge Polar Bears
- Arctic Refuge Leasing Revenue Projections Do Not Add Up
- S. 2461 - Arctic Refuge Protection Act
- H.R. 1146 - Arctic Cultural & Coastal Plain Protection Act
Congressional Letters
- Letter from Senate Democrats to the Comptroller of Currency on Arctic Refuge Financing Decisions, October 2020
- Letter from House Natural Resource Committee and Subcommittee Chairs to DOI Secretary Bernhardt on the Biological Opinion for the Arctic Refuge Leasing Program, July 2020
- Letter from House Democrats to Banks Asking them to Refuse Financing for Oil Development in the Arctic Refuge, February 2020
- Letter from Senate Democrats to Banks Asking them to Refuse Financing for Oil Development in the Arctic Refuge, January 2020
- Letter from House Democrats Supporting the Arctic Refuge Provision of the FY20 House Interior Appropriations Bill, November 2019
- Letter from Senate Democrats Supporting the Arctic Refuge Provision of the FY20 House Interior Appropriations Bill, November 2019
- Letter from the House Natural Resources Committee to DOI Secretary Bernhardt on the Arctic Refuge Draft EIS, July 2019
- Letter from Senate Democrats to Acting DOI Secretary Bernhardt to Request a Draft EIS Comment Period Extension, January 2019
Public Letters
- Letter from Scholars and Teachers to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Opposing the Draft EIS, March 2019
- Letter from Scientists to Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Opposing the Draft EIS, March 2019
- Letter from the Gwich'in Steering Committee Opposing Development in the Arctic Refuge, May 2018
- Letter from Investors Worth $2.52 Trillion Opposing Development in the Arctic Refuge, May 2018
Maps
- Arctic Refuge Map - National Geographic
- Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (ASRC) Lands in the Arctic Refuge
- Porcupine Caribou Herd Migration Route Map - Gwich'in Steering Committee
- Oil and Gas Leasing Along Alaska's North Slope
- Arctic Values Map
- Bird Migration Map
Research & Reports
- Trump’s Energy Policies Put Alaska in the Climate Crosshairs - Center for American Progress, November 2019
- Taxpayers Lose on Arctic Drilling: Big Revenue Promises Don't Add Up - Taxpayers for Common Sense, August 2019
- The Energy and Climate Impacts of Oil Drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge - Symons Public Affairs, July 2019
- The Most Powerful Arctic Lobby Group You've Never Heard Of - Center for American Progress, August 2018
- Americans Oppose Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - Yale Climate Connections, December 2017
- Oil Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Impacts on Deficit and National Energy Security, November 2017
- Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 101 - Center for American Progress, October 2017